State v. Jenkins
114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 381, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 774
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jenkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 Or. App. 384 →
Opinion
Appellant challenges an order of involuntary commitment, arguing that the evidence submitted at the hearing did not establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or to others. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support the order of involuntary commitment. We accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jenkins, 114 P.3d 538, 200 Or. App. 381, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 774 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
114 P.3d 538 (State v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.