State v. Jackson

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-39907

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAVID JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant

Arlon L. Stoker, Jr. Farmington, NM

for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR: KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge