State v. Jackson

CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 28, 2021
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Jackson (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jackson, (N.M. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38553

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BRIAN JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY Louis P. McDonald, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Charles J. Gutierrez, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

Arthur Hernandez Rio Rancho, NM

for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1} The State appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress an officer’s testimony. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm. The State filed a notice of non-opposition to our calendar notice, stating that it does not oppose the proposed summary disposition. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-nmctapp-2021.