State v. Jackson
This text of State v. Jackson (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-38553
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BRIAN JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY Louis P. McDonald, District Judge
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Charles J. Gutierrez, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM
for Appellant
Arthur Hernandez Rio Rancho, NM
for Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Chief Judge.
{1} The State appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress an officer’s testimony. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm. The State filed a notice of non-opposition to our calendar notice, stating that it does not oppose the proposed summary disposition. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-nmctapp-2021.