State v. Jackson

129 So. 3d 520, 2013 WL 6050369, 2013 La. LEXIS 2457
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 La. LEXIS 16
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 15, 2013·No. No. 2013-KK-1409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. While defendant has always maintained his innocence, he pled guilty pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). Given the unique facts of this case relating to the veracity of the arresting officer which arose prior to sentencing, we find the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 559; see also State v. Lapoint, 94-1173 (La.9/23/94), 642 So.2d 1304. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated, and this case is remanded for purposes of allowing the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea.

WRIT GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.

GUIDRY, J., dissents. CLARK, J., dissents and would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 129 So. 3d 520, 2013 WL 6050369, 2013 La. LEXIS 2457 (La. 2013).

129 So. 3d 520 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina v. Alford
400 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Lapoint
642 So. 2d 1304 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)