State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Jackson

213 So. 2d 772, 252 La. 706, 1968 La. LEXIS 2601

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 24, 1968

DocketNo. 49507

StatusPublished

This text of 213 So. 2d 772 (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jackson, 213 So. 2d 772, 252 La. 706, 1968 La. LEXIS 2601 (La. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Stanley H. Jackson applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied. The defendant has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of his conviction.

SUMMERS, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs. It was error for the court to refuse to furnish relator with a certified copy of the transcript to serve as a basis for perfecting bills of exceptions, which could, in turn, support the allegations of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Stanley H. Jackson applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied. The defendant has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of his conviction.

SUMMERS, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs. It was error for the court to refuse to furnish relator with a certified copy of the transcript to serve as a basis for perfecting bills of exceptions, which could, in turn, support the allegations of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 So. 2d 772, 252 La. 706, 1968 La. LEXIS 2601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-la-1968.