State v. Isom
This text of 938 S.W.2d 298 (State v. Isom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Mother and state appeal the order in a paternity action contending the trial court erred in failing to award retroactive child support. Respondent cross-appeals asserting that the current child support order was not supported by competent evidence nor was a Form 14 introduced into evidence. [299]*299Respondent also appeals the trial court’s order requiring him to pay the cost of the blood tests. We affirm.
Appellants did not meet their burden of proof under the Uniform Parentage Act for retroactive child support. There was also competent evidence in front of the trial court to support the current child support award. Glenn v. Francis, 864 S.W.2d 947 (Mo.App.1993).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. Since an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
938 S.W.2d 298, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-isom-moctapp-1997.