State v. Irish

565 N.W.2d 161, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 1997 Wisc. App. LEXIS 355
CourtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin
DecidedApril 8, 1997
Docket96-2303
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 565 N.W.2d 161 (State v. Irish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Irish, 565 N.W.2d 161, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 1997 Wisc. App. LEXIS 355 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

LaROCQUE, J.

Robert Irish appeals his civil commitment as a sexually violent person pursuant to ch. 980, STATS., commonly known as the "sexual predator law." Irish challenges' the trial court's legal conclusion that his 1991 conviction for child enticement under a repealed and recreated statute is *109 an appropriate predicate sex offense essential to a commitment. Chapter 980 applies to a person previously convicted of a "sexually violent offense," as defined in § 980.01(6), STATS. 1 Because a ch. 980 commitment requires a prior conviction of certain sex crimes, the basis of Irish's challenge is whether his 1991 conviction for child enticement set forth in § 944.12, Stats., 1987-88, a crime that was repealed and recreated as § 948.07, Stats., prior to the adoption of ch. 980 provides a basis for commitment. Section 980.01(6) defines a "sexually violent offense," among others, as "Any crime specified" in § 948.07. We conclude that the "crime specified" in § 948.07 is child enticement, the title to both the former and the present statute, and that the legislative act of repealing and recreating the former statute does not exempt Irish from ch. 980. We therefore affirm the judgment of commitment. 2

*110 The issue Irish raises requires us to construe § 980.01(6), Stats. 3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis. 2d 754, 760-61, 465 N.W.2d 520, 523 (Ct. App. 1990). The guiding principle in construction of statutes is to discern the legislative intent. Hemerley v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 127 Wis. 2d 304, 308, 379 N.W.2d 860, 863 (Ct. App. 1985). The interaction of two or more statutes can operate to create an ambiguity. Trojan v. Board of Regents, 100 Wis. 2d 53, 57, 301 N.W.2d 269, 270 (Ct. App. 1980), reversed on other grounds, 104 Wis. 2d 277, 311 N.W.2d 586 (1981). If the statute is ambiguous, the court must look to legislative intent found in its scope, history, context, subject matter and its intended object. Wisconsin's Environ. Decade v. PSC, 81 Wis. 2d 344, 350, 260 N.W.2d 712, 715 (1978).

We determine that the statutory definition of "Sexually violent offense" found in ch. 980, STATS., is ambiguous. This term could mean, as Irish would have us read it, only a conviction under the recreated statute, § 948.07, Stats. On the other hand, § 948.07 retains the title "Child enticement," and the definition *111 of sexually violent offense refers not to a conviction under § 948.07, but to "any crime specified" in that section. Thus, a reasonable alternative reading of the definition would include a child enticement conviction that occurred prior to reenactment of the crime in its present form and number.

In examining the scope and history of the crime of child enticement, we observe that the legislature not only retained the title "Child enticement" to describe the offense, but it is also apparent that anyone convicted under the former statute of child enticement could be convicted under the new one. This is so because the changes made in § 948.07, Stats., broaden rather than restrict the scope of the offense.

The former provision, § 944.12, Stats., 1987-88, punished anyone "18 years of age or over, who, with intent to commit a crime against sexual morality, persuades or entices any child under 18 years of age into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place ...." The statute as recreated, § 948.07, STATS., punishes anyone who, with intent to commit a specified list of crimes involving children, "causes or attempts to cause any child who has not attained the age of 18 years of age to go into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place ...."

The legislative comment to § 948.07, STATS., provides as follows:

Comments — 1987 Act 332
This section:
1. Deletes the words "persuades or entices" contained in the current child enticement statute [s.944.12] and, instead, characterizes the crime of child enticement as "causing or attempting to cause" a child to go into any vehicle, building, room *112 or secluded place with the intent to commit a criminal act or acts. The substitution of "causes" for "persuades or entices", eliminates as an element of the crime the state of mind of the child being enticed. The language "attempts to cause" is added to further clarify that the crime of child enticement includes the attempted act of enticement, consistent with s. 939.32(l)(d), as created by this bill.
2. Deletes the provision under current law limiting the applicability of the child enticement statute to offenders 18 years of age or over. Under the bill, any person can be charged with and convicted of enticing a child, even if the offender is also a child. Consequently, under the bill, an offender who is a child would be treated as a juvenile offender, as is done with other crimes committed by minors.
3. Enumerates specific intended purposes as those for which enticing a child would be a criminal act (e.g., having sexual contact, including sexual intercourse, with the child). These enumerated purposes are substituted for the current language requiring an intent to commit "a crime against sexual morality."

Thus, in view of the expansive coverage provided, it would seem anomalous for the legislature to exclude those convicted under the earlier statute, § 944.12, Stats. 1987-88.

Our conclusion is further supported if we look to relevant historical background of the enactment of ch. 980, Stats. This enactment is sometimes referred to as the "Gerald Turner" law:

The enactment of chapter 980 was preceded by a widely publicized, highly politicized and extremely *113 emotional public debate following the release of the notorious sex offender Gerald Turner.

State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 343, 541 N.W.2d 115, 138-39 (1995) (Abrahamson, J., dissenting). Contemporary news reports show that Turner's 1975 convictions included enticing a child for immoral purposes , 4

As further evidence that the legislature meant to incorporate the former child enticing statute as part of the definition of a "Sexually violent offense," is the broad temporal scope of ch. 980, Stats. Section 980.13, Stats., provides:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
2002 WI App 60 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2002)
State v. Carlson
2002 WI App 44 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
VanCleve v. City of Marinette
2002 WI App 10 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
Gasper Ex Rel. Martin v. Parbs
2001 WI App 259 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Skibinski
2001 WI App 109 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Sorenson
2001 WI App 251 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
In Re Annexation of Smith Property
2001 WI App 201 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Koenck
2001 WI App 93 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Gibbs
2001 WI App 83 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Pharm
2000 WI App 167 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2000)
State v. Watson
595 N.W.2d 403 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1999)
Drow v. Schwartz
583 N.W.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1998)
Sawyer v. Midelfort
579 N.W.2d 268 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 N.W.2d 161, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 1997 Wisc. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-irish-wisctapp-1997.