State v. Ibraheem

658 N.E.2d 721, 74 Ohio St. 3d 276
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 1996·No. No. 95-1145·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant makes no attempt to show good cause for such a -late application. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ibraheem, 658 N.E.2d 721, 74 Ohio St. 3d 276 (Ohio 1996).

658 N.E.2d 721 (State v. Ibraheem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ibraheem
1996 Ohio 12 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)