State v. Hynes
This text of 458 So. 2d 1303 (State v. Hynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state has appealed from a district court judgment holding La.C.Cr.P. art. 493.1 unconstitutional. This is a companion case to State v. Johnson, 458 So.2d 1301 (La.1984), the cases having been consolidated for argument in this Court.
The legal issue and procedural posture in two cases are identical.1 In each the defendant has requested a jury trial because the cumulative penalty exposure he faces for the crimes with which he has been charged exceeds six months imprisonment. La. Const, art. I, § 17; State v. McCarroll, 337 So.2d 475 (La.1976). The state opposes the jury trial request, relying on La.C.Cr.P. art. 493.1. The trial court, relying on a ruling by the chief judge of that court in another case, State v. Odell, 458 So.2d 1304 (La.1984), effectively found the provision was unconstitutional. For the reasons assigned in the companion Johnson case, we hold that the lower court erred in its ruling.
Decree
The district court judgment holding that La.C.Cr.P. art. 493.1 is unconstitutional is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.
REVERSED; REMANDED..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 So. 2d 1303, 1984 La. LEXIS 10108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hynes-la-1984.