State v. Humphrey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Humphrey

880 S.W.2d 650, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1297, 1994 WL 411936

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 9, 1994·No. No. 64383·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced by the court as a prior offender and prior drug offender to a prison term of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced by the court as a prior offender and prior drug offender to a prison term of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Humphrey, 880 S.W.2d 650, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1297, 1994 WL 411936 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

880 S.W.2d 650 (State v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.