State v. Humphrey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Humphrey

846 S.W.2d 203, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1010, 1992 WL 137595

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Humphrey. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 610 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 1992·No. Nos. 58993, 60746·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Donald Humphrey, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sentencing him to two concurrent terms for possession of burglar’s tools and attempted burglary, second degree. He also appeals from the judgment denying his post-conviction claims after oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgments of the trial and motion courts are affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Donald Humphrey, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sentencing him to two concurrent terms for possession of burglar’s tools and attempted burglary, second degree. He also appeals from the judgment denying his post-conviction claims after oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgments of the trial and motion courts are affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Humphrey, 846 S.W.2d 203, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1010, 1992 WL 137595 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

846 S.W.2d 203 (State v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.