State v. Hughes
97 Tex. 520
Opinion
In this case it appears that defendant in error purchased the land after proof and certificate of three years’ occupancy, relying upon such certificate and paying full value for the land without notice of the fact of nonoccupancy alleged as a ground for canceling the sale. In refusing the application we think it proper to say that we hold that the defense of innocent purchaser under the certificate is good against the attack of the State upon the sale on the ground of nonoccupancy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hughes, 97 Tex. 520 (Tex. 1904).
97 Tex. 520 (State v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sneed
181 S.W.2d 983 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Blaffer v. State
31 S.W.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)