State v. Hughes

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hughes

2011 Ohio 4036, 129 Ohio St. 3d 340

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 2011·No. 2010-2088·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Mbodji, 129 Ohio St.3d 325, 2011-Ohio-2880, 951 N.E.2d 1025.

*341 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melanie J. Reising, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shelia Kyle-Reno, Hamilton County Public Defender, and Robert R. Hastings Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Mbodji, 129 Ohio St.3d 325, 2011-Ohio-2880, 951 N.E.2d 1025.

*341 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melanie J. Reising, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shelia Kyle-Reno, Hamilton County Public Defender, and Robert R. Hastings Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

State v. Hughes, 2011 Ohio 4036, 129 Ohio St. 3d 340 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

2011 Ohio 4036 (State v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related