State v. Hughes
This text of 353 S.W.3d 684 (State v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*685 ORDER
The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal challenging the order of the trial court granting Daniel Hughes’ pretrial motions to suppress evidence and statements. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2011 WL 5864713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-moctapp-2011.