Hall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hall v. State

353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2011 WL 5864679

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 2011

DocketED 96744

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 S.W.3d 684 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hall v. State, 353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2011 WL 5864679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Calvin W. Hall appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Hall’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Calvin W. Hall appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Hall’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2011 WL 5864679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack