Hall v. State
353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2011 WL 5864679
Opinion
ORDER
Calvin W. Hall appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Hall’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hall v. State, 353 S.W.3d 684, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2011 WL 5864679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
353 S.W.3d 684 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hughes
353 S.W.3d 684 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)