State v. Howley

764 P.2d 233, 94 Or. App. 3, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2161
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 16, 1988·No. 87-NB-1155; CA A47416·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s conviction for harassment was reversed by this court for lack of evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the cause remanded for a new trial. State v. Howley, 92 Or App 575, 758 P2d 893 (1988). On motion for reconsideration, defendant argues that a retrial in this case is prohibited by the former jeopardy provisions of ORS 131.515; Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution; and the Fifth Amendment. The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to a jury verdict or by the order of an appellate court. Or Const, Art I, § 12.

Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; remanded with instructions to dismiss complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Howley, 764 P.2d 233, 94 Or. App. 3, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2161 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

764 P.2d 233 (State v. Howley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dixon
83 P.3d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State v. Thomas
791 P.2d 862 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
State v. Saude
769 P.2d 784 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
State v. Howley
764 P.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)