State v. Howell

833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 1992 WL 182242
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1427
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 4, 1992·No. No. 60655·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Howell, 833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 1992 WL 182242 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

833 S.W.2d 49 (State v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.