State v. Howell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howell

833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 1992 WL 182242

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 4, 1992

DocketNo. 60655

StatusPublished

This text of 833 S.W.2d 49 (State v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Howell, 833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 1992 WL 182242 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 1992 WL 182242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howell-moctapp-1992.