State v. Horn

206 P.3d 526, 288 Kan. 690, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMay 8, 2009
Docket100,373
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 526 (State v. Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Horn, 206 P.3d 526, 288 Kan. 690, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 81 (kan 2009).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Joshua M. Horn pled guilty to one count of attempted aggravated criminal sodomy in violation of K.S.A. 21-3301(a), (c), and 21-3506(a)(l). Applying the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4643, commonly referred to as Jessica’s Law, the district court sentenced Horn to life in prison with a mandatoiy minimum prison term of 25 years (hard 25). Horn appeals that sentence, claiming that he should have received a Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) sentence for a nondrug severity level 1 felony, as provided in K.S.A. 21-3301(c). Applying the rule of lenity to resolve the conflicting statutory provisions applicable in this case, we vacate Horn’s sentence and remand for resentencing under the KSGA for a nondrug severity level 1 crime.

The facts underlying Horn’s conviction are not germane to this opinion; it is enough to know that Horn was convicted of attempted *691 aggravated criminal sodomy. The sole legal question before us is which of two statutes, each plainly applicable to the sentencing of attempted aggravated criminal sodomy, is to control. We exercise unlimited review of statutory interpretation questions, unfettered by the trial court’s findings. See State v. Thompson, 287 Kan. 238, 243, 200 P.3d 22 (2009); State v. Bryan, 281 Kan. 157, 159, 130 P.3d 85 (2006).

The crime of aggravated criminal sodomy is set forth in K.S.A. 21-3506. One means to commit the crime, as described in K.S.A. 21-3506(a)(l), is to engage in sodomy with a child under 14 years of age. If the offender is 18 years of age or older, the aggravated criminal sodomy described in subsection (a)(1) is an off-grid felony. K.S.A. 21-3506(c). In that circumstance, “the sentence shall be imprisonment for life pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4643, and amendments thereto.” K.S.A. 21-4706(d). K.S.A. 21-4643, Jessica’s Law, mandates a minimum prison term of 25 years for certain crimes, including “aggravated criminal sodomy, as defined in subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) of K.S.A. 21-3506, and amendments thereto.” K.S.A. 21-4643(a)(1)(D).

However, Horn was convicted of an attempt to commit aggravated criminal sodomy. K.S.A. 21-3506 does not specify attempted sodomy as a means of violating that statute. Cf. K.S.A. 21-3449 (specifically describing the crime of terrorism as including “the attempt to commit or the conspiracy to commit”). Therefore, as the State apparently recognized with its statutory citations in the amended information, attempted aggravated criminal sodomy is a separate offense created by the provisions of K.S.A. 21-3301(a), the statute setting forth the elements of the anticipatory crime of attempt. See State v. Martens, 274 Kan. 459, 464-65, 54 P.3d 960 (2002) (where statute only criminalized the manufacture of controlled substance, the attempted manufacture of controlled substance was a separate offense controlled by K.S.A. 21-3301[a]). In turn, K.S.A. 21-3301(c) specifies that an attempt to commit an off-grid felony is to be ranked at nondrug severity level 1, indicating that the presumptive sentence is to be found in the KSGA nondrug grid.

*692 However, a provision of Jessica’s Law, K.S.A. 21-4643(a)(1)(G), also purports to apply its hard 25 life imprisonment sentencing to “an attempt, conspiracy or criminal solicitation, as defined in K.S.A. 21-3301, 21-3302 or 21-3303, and amendments thereto, of an offense defined in paragraphs (A) through (F).” Thus, the same crime of attempted aggravated criminal sodomy, when committed by an adult offender on a child under 14 years, is subject to two statutory sentencing provisions: a KSGA sentence under the statute creating the offense, K.S.A. 21-3301, and an off-grid, mandatory minimum sentence under Jessica’s Law, K.S.A. 21-4643.

Each statute is plain and unambiguous, which would normally preclude the application of any rules of construction or the reliance on legislative history. See In re KM.H., 285 Kan. 53, 79-80, 169 P.3d 1025 (2007). The conundrum arises not from any lack of clarity in statutory language, but rather from the existence of two statutes which appear to be controlling, yet are conflicting.

One proposed argument is that, when general and specific statutes are in conflict, the specific statute controls unless it appears the legislature intended otherwise. See In re K.M.H., 285 Kan. at 82; State v. Le, 260 Kan. 845, 848, 926 P.2d 638 (1996). The argument here assumes that Jessica’s Law is the specific statute. However, one could view the statute which sets forth the elements of the crime to be the specific one, and the statute which lumps together attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation for sentencing purposes to be more general. Here, the crime of attempt is specifically defined by K.S.A. 21-3301(a).

Nevertheless, the legislature sent a mixed message during the 2006 session in which it adopted Jessica’s Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Evans
Supreme Court of Kansas, 2026
State v. Sanders
563 P.3d 234 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025)
State v. Seck
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2024
State v. George
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2024
State v. Mora
509 P.3d 1201 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2022)
State v. Epp
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2020
State v. Vaughn
472 P.3d 1139 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2020)
State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2020
State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2019
McCullough v. Wilson
426 P.3d 494 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2018)
State v. Horn
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2016
State v. Williams
368 P.3d 1065 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2016)
State v. Swazey
357 P.3d 893 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2015)
State v. Haskell
337 P.3d 705 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2014)
State v. Beaman
286 P.3d 876 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2012)
State v. Coman
273 P.3d 701 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2012)
State v. Turner
272 P.3d 19 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2012)
State v. Cash
263 P.3d 786 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2011)
State v. Chavez
254 P.3d 539 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2011)
State v. Perry-Coutcher
254 P.3d 556 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 526, 288 Kan. 690, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-horn-kan-2009.