State v. Holliday
989 A.2d 605, 295 Conn. 909
This text of 989 A.2d 605 (State v. Holliday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Holliday, 989 A.2d 605, 295 Conn. 909 (Colo. 2010).
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Dean B. HOLLIDAY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dean B. Holliday, pro se, in support of the petition.
Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 35, 982 A.2d 268 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Holliday
982 A.2d 268 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
State v. Holliday
989 A.2d 605 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
989 A.2d 605, 295 Conn. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-holliday-conn-2010.