State v. Hoffman
This text of 2024 ND 182 (State v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2024 ND 182
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Heather Renee Faith Hoffman, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20240095
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Hoffman No. 20240095
[¶1] Heather Hoffman appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted her of murder, a class AA felony. Hoffman argues the district court abused its discretion by denying her Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., motion for judgment of acquittal because there is insufficient evidence to support her conviction. After reviewing the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion by denying Hoffman’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 ND 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hoffman-nd-2024.