State v. Hoey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Hoey

647 S.E.2d 427, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 566

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 29, 2007·No. No. 234P07.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of May 2007."

*428Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 29th day of May 2007."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of May 2007."

*428Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 29th day of May 2007."

State v. Hoey, 647 S.E.2d 427, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 566 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

647 S.E.2d 427 (State v. Hoey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related