State v. Hines
This text of 2012 Ohio 5908 (State v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Hines, 135 Ohio St.3d 134, 2012-Ohio-5908.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HINES, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Hines, 135 Ohio St.3d 134, 2012-Ohio-5908.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Gardner. (No. 2012-0371—Submitted December 13, 2012—Decided December 18, 2012. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 24346, 2012-Ohio-207. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gardner, 135 Ohio St.3d 99, 2012-Ohio-5683, 984 N.E.2d 1025. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. KENNEDY, J., not participating. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and R. Lynn Nothstine, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Kristine E. Comunale, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hines-ohio-2012.