State v. Hicks

61 S.W. 193, 160 Mo. 468, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 69
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 26, 1901·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SHERWOOD, P. J.

There are no statements or briefs, etc., on either side in this case.

The indictment, supposedly framed under section 1892, Revised Statutes 1899, held bad, and quashed on motion of defendant. State appeals, but there is no bill of exceptions, and so the motion to quash has not been preserved. The only repository known to the law for preserving matters of exception, is by a bill for that purpose. [State v. Wear, 145 Mo. loc. cit. 204, 205, and cas. cit.]

Therefore, appeal dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hicks, 61 S.W. 193, 160 Mo. 468, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 69 (Mo. 1901).

61 S.W. 193 (State v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Glasscock
134 S.W. 549 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
State v. Little
128 S.W. 971 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
City of Tarkio v. Clark
85 S.W. 329 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)