State v. Hicks
61 S.W. 193, 160 Mo. 468, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 69
Opinion
There are no statements or briefs, etc., on either side in this case.
The indictment, supposedly framed under section 1892, Revised Statutes 1899, held bad, and quashed on motion of defendant. State appeals, but there is no bill of exceptions, and so the motion to quash has not been preserved. The only repository known to the law for preserving matters of exception, is by a bill for that purpose. [State v. Wear, 145 Mo. loc. cit. 204, 205, and cas. cit.]
Therefore, appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hicks, 61 S.W. 193, 160 Mo. 468, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 69 (Mo. 1901).
61 S.W. 193 (State v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Glasscock
134 S.W. 549 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
State v. Little
128 S.W. 971 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
City of Tarkio v. Clark
85 S.W. 329 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)