State v. Herndon

5 Blackf. 75, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 8
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1839·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Dewey, J.

Indictment for assault and battery. The defendant pleaded in abatement that one of the grand jurors who preferred the bill, and who had been selected as a talesman, was not a householder or freeholder. The state demurred; the demurrer was overruled, and the defendant discharged.

The Circuit Court was correct in sustaining the plea. The statute regulating the mode of summoning grand and [76] petit jurors, requires that the jurors be selected from the list of taxable persons, and that they be good reputable freeholders or householders of the proper county. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 291. A talesman is such a person as is qualified to be on the original panel.

TY. Quarles, for the state. T. J. Evans, for the defendant.

If a grand juror lack any of the qualifications required by the statute, it is a good cause of challenge ; or the defendant, before issue joined, may plead the objection in avoidance. Vattier v. The State. 4 Blackf. 73.—1 Chitt. C. L. 308.—Bac. Abr. tit. Juries A.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Herndon, 5 Blackf. 75, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 8 (Ind. 1839).

5 Blackf. 75 (State v. Herndon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
32 N.E.2d 705 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1941)
Stipp v. State
118 N.E. 818 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1918)
Crowley v. United States
194 U.S. 461 (Supreme Court, 1904)
State v. Easter
30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 542 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1876)
Ward v. State
48 Ind. 289 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Bell v. State
42 Ind. 335 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
McQuillen v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 358 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Hardin v. State
22 Ind. 347 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Shattuck v. State
11 Ind. 473 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
People v. Robinson
2 Park. Cr. 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
Straugban v. State
16 Ark. 37 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1855)