State v. Herndon

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Herndon

894 So. 2d 966

DecidedFebruary 17, 2005

DocketNos. SC03-828, SC03-912, SC03-928, SC03-929, SC03-930, SC03-937, SC03-941, SC03-962, SC03-972, SC03-993, SC03-994, SC03-1015, SC03-1163, SC03-1189, SC03-1386, SC03-1404, SC03-1406, SC03-1407, SC03-1807, SC03-1910, SC03-2036, SC03-2051, SC03-2284, SC03-2293, SC04-585

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 894 So. 2d 966 (State v. Herndon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Herndon, 894 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

PARIENTE, C.J.

We have the decisions in each of these cases for review, based on express and direct conflict or certified conflict with a decision of this Court or another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), (4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction, consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, summarily quash the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 887 So.2d 1063 (Fla.2004), and State v. Green, 887 So.2d 1089 (Fla.2004). We decline to address the additional issues, including those relating to resentencing, raised in several of these cases.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARIENTE, C.J.

We have the decisions in each of these cases for review, based on express and direct conflict or certified conflict with a decision of this Court or another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), (4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction, consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, summarily quash the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 887 So.2d 1063 (Fla.2004), and State v. Green, 887 So.2d 1089 (Fla.2004). We decline to address the additional issues, including those relating to resentencing, raised in several of these cases.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 So. 2d 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herndon-fla-2005.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack