State v. Henderson
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 22
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Jarrod Donald Henderson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20240118
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Logan J. Simons, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Henderson
No. 20240118
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Jarrod Henderson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. He argues the evidence is insufficient to support the verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts, and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See State v. Enriquez, 2024 ND 164, ¶ 24, 10 N.W.3d 777 (concluding the State can rely on surrounding facts and circumstances, including testimony from a lay witness, to prove a weapon is a firearm as defined in N.D.C.C. § 12.1-01-04(9), a statutory provision that is nearly identical to the definition under N.D.C.C. § 62.1-01-01(3), as charged in this case).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 ND 22 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.