State v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Henderson

336 So. 2d 874, 1976 La. LEXIS 4462

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 10, 1976

DocketNo. 58312

StatusPublished

This text of 336 So. 2d 874 (State v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Henderson, 336 So. 2d 874, 1976 La. LEXIS 4462 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of La. through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, Orleans Parish, applying for writ of Certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, III, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 24th day of September, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 17th day of December, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of La. through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, Orleans Parish, applying for writ of Certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, III, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 24th day of September, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 17th day of December, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 So. 2d 874, 1976 La. LEXIS 4462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henderson-la-1976.