State ex rel. Meyers v. Henderson
Opinion
In re Calvin David Meyers applying for Writ of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus.
Granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered with the object of making an express finding on the question: judged by objective standards under circumstances as they existed at the time, was the applicant reasonably justified in his mistaken impression that the sentence he would receive would be concurrent with the Texas sentence. See Mosher v. Lavallee, 2 Cir., 491 F.2d 1346; U. S. v. Valenciano, 3 Cir., 495 F.2d 585; Moorhead v. U. S., 3 Cir., 456 F.2d 992.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
337 So. 2d 204 (State ex rel. Meyers v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.