State v. Helm

2004 ND 88, 679 N.W.2d 770, 2004 WL 1078156
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 2004
Docket20030273
StatusPublished

This text of 2004 ND 88 (State v. Helm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Helm, 2004 ND 88, 679 N.W.2d 770, 2004 WL 1078156 (N.D. 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam

[¶ 1] Steven Helm appealed from a criminal judgment finding him guilty of two counts of class C felony terrorizing in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04. On appeal, Helm argues there waso insufficient evidence to support the conviction. Helm also argues the district court reached an absurd result in its application of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04 and invites this Court to read an imminent threat requirement into the statute. This Court previously a addressed the lack of an imminency element in the terrorizingl statute in State v. Carlson, 1997 ND 7, 559 N.W.2d 802. We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.,

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

*Page 126

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carlson
1997 ND 7 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 ND 88, 679 N.W.2d 770, 2004 WL 1078156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-helm-nd-2004.