State v. Heil

95 Ohio St. 3d 531
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 2002·No. No. 2001-0900·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, for want of a final appealable order.

{¶ 2} Because there was no final appealable order and because the motion was not proper, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. David P. Joyce, Geauga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Darya Jeffreys Klammer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito Co., L.P.A., and Michael A. Partlow, for appellee. LuWayne Annos, Trumbull County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate State Solicitor, urging vacation of judgment or reversal for amicus curiae Attorney General.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Heil, 95 Ohio St. 3d 531 (Ohio 2002).

95 Ohio St. 3d 531 (State v. Heil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bancroft, Unpublished Decision (1-14-2005)
2005 Ohio 141 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Glavic, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2003)
2003 Ohio 6961 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. May, Unpublished Decision (12-19-2003)
2003 Ohio 6979 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. McDowell, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)
2003 Ohio 5352 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. Roux
797 N.E.2d 112 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. Heil
2002 Ohio 2841 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)