State v. Haworth

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. Haworth

50 N.W. 676, 85 Iowa 712

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedDecember 18, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 N.W. 676 (State v. Haworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haworth, 50 N.W. 676, 85 Iowa 712 (iowa 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Granger, J.

We are without jurisdiction to determine the question presented in the ease. The defendant was, hy an order of this court, permitted to present his abstract of record in type-writing. An abstract is on file, but it nowhere shows that a judgment has been entered in the case, and no appeal can be taken in a criminal case until after a judgment has been rendered. Code, section 4522. The fact is jurisdictional, and must affirmatively appear. State v. Wheeler, 65 Iowa, 619. See, also, State v. Briggs, 73 Iowa, 456. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granger, J.

We are without jurisdiction to determine the question presented in the ease. The defendant was, hy an order of this court, permitted to present his abstract of record in type-writing. An abstract is on file, but it nowhere shows that a judgment has been entered in the case, and no appeal can be taken in a criminal case until after a judgment has been rendered. Code, section 4522. The fact is jurisdictional, and must affirmatively appear. State v. Wheeler, 65 Iowa, 619. See, also, State v. Briggs, 73 Iowa, 456. The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 N.W. 676, 85 Iowa 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haworth-iowa-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack