State v. Doty

80 N.W. 505, 109 Iowa 453
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 21, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 N.W. 505 (State v. Doty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Doty, 80 N.W. 505, 109 Iowa 453 (iowa 1899).

Opinion

Ladd, J.

Indictment for libel, to which the defendant interposed a demurrer. This was overruled, and the'appeal is from that ruling. It does not appear judgment has ever been entered. In a criminal action, “an appeal can only betaken from final judgment.” Code, section 5448. An order overruling a demurrer is not such. State v. Swearengen, 43 Iowa, 336. To confer jurisdiction, the abstract mustf affirmatively show that final judgment has been entered,. [454]*454State v. Wheeler, 65 Iowa, 619; State v. Haworth, 85 Iowa, 712; State v. Briggs, 73 Iowa, 456. It follows that this .appeal must be dismissed. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Anderson
60 N.W.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.W. 505, 109 Iowa 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-doty-iowa-1899.