State v. Hawkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hawkins

423 S.W.3d 847, 2014 WL 840074, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 236

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 2014

DocketNo. ED 99692

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 423 S.W.3d 847 (State v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hawkins, 423 S.W.3d 847, 2014 WL 840074, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mario Hawkins appeals from a sentence and judgment of two counts of sodomy in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mario Hawkins appeals from a sentence and judgment of two counts of sodomy in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

423 S.W.3d 847, 2014 WL 840074, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hawkins-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack