Hawkins v. State

485 S.W.3d 391, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2016 WL 1221450
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2016·No. No. ED 102856·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Mario Hawkins (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2006). Movant was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison on each count. This Court affirmed his conviction and sentence. State v. Hawkins, 423 S.W.3d 847 (Mo.App.E.D.2014). We affirm the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished -with a [392] memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins v. State, 485 S.W.3d 391, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2016 WL 1221450 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

485 S.W.3d 391 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hawkins
423 S.W.3d 847 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)