Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Hartford

State v. Hartford

708 S.E.2d 716, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 316, 2011 WL 2119246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hartford. Read the opinion of the Court — 365 N.C. 330 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 20, 2011·No. 102A11-1·Published

Opinion

708 S.E.2d 716 (2011)

STATE
v.
Timothy HARTFORD, Jr.

No. 102A11-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2011.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Hartford, Timothy (Jr.).

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hartford, Timothy (Jr.).

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of May 2011 by for Extension of Time to Prepare Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of May 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hartford, 708 S.E.2d 716, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 316, 2011 WL 2119246 (N.C. 2011).

708 S.E.2d 716 (State v. Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.