Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Hartford

State v. Hartford

708 S.E.2d 716, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 316, 2011 WL 2119246
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 20, 2011
Docket102A11-1
StatusPublished

This text of 708 S.E.2d 716 (State v. Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hartford, 708 S.E.2d 716, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 316, 2011 WL 2119246 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

708 S.E.2d 716 (2011)

STATE
v.
Timothy HARTFORD, Jr.

No. 102A11-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2011.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Hartford, Timothy (Jr.).

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hartford, Timothy (Jr.).

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of May 2011 by for Extension of Time to Prepare Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of May 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 S.E.2d 716, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 316, 2011 WL 2119246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartford-nc-2011.