State v. Hart
94 A. 50, 87 N.J.L. 329, 2 Gummere 329, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hart. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 N.J.L. 261 →
Opinion
The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.
[330]*330For affirmance—The Ci-iiee Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisct-i, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Williams, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard,' Black, White, Terhune, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hart, 94 A. 50, 87 N.J.L. 329, 2 Gummere 329, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1915).
94 A. 50 (State v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.