State v. Hart

94 A. 50, 87 N.J.L. 329, 2 Gummere 329, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 229
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 25, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 94 A. 50 (State v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hart, 94 A. 50, 87 N.J.L. 329, 2 Gummere 329, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.

[330]*330For affirmance—The Ci-iiee Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisct-i, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard,' Black, White, Terhune, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A. 50, 87 N.J.L. 329, 2 Gummere 329, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hart-nj-1915.