State v. Harry Cloud Transport, Inc.

505 S.W.2d 798, 17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 214, 1974 Tex. LEXIS 255
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1974
DocketB-4343
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 505 S.W.2d 798 (State v. Harry Cloud Transport, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harry Cloud Transport, Inc., 505 S.W.2d 798, 17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 214, 1974 Tex. LEXIS 255 (Tex. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Texas brought this suit in Nueces County, Texas, against Harry Cloud Transport, Inc., alleging violations of the Texas Motor Carrier Act. The trial court overruled defendant’s plea of privilege to be sued in Comanche County, Texas, but the Court of Civil Appeals ordered the cause transferred. 500 S.W.2d 705.

Harry Cloud Transport, Inc., is a Texas corporation whose principal place of business is in Comanche County. On July 7, 1972, the State filed suit in the District Court of Nueces County alleging that Harry Cloud Transport, Inc., under a buy-sell arrangement, had transported milo grain for compensation or hire in Nueces County without an appropriate permit or certificate in violation of Article 911b, Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. The State sought civil penalties and injunctive relief as provided in Article 1690b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. Article 1690b provides in part:

(b) . Suit for such . penalties shall be instituted and conducted . . .in the county in which the violation occurs. .
(c) Upon the violation of any provision of this Act . . . any District Court of any county where such violation occurs shall have the power to restrain and enjoin the . . . corporation so offending ....

The Legislature in Article 1690b has fixed the venue of this suit in a county in which a violation occurs. Since no violation was alleged to have occurred in Comanche *799 County, the Court of Civil Appeals erred in transferring the cause there. Gambill v. Town of Ponder, 494 S.W.2d 808 (Tex. 1973); Harrington v. State of Texas, 363 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.Civ.App. 1963, writ ref’d n.r.e.). Accordingly, under the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure upon granting the application for writ of error and without hearing argument in the case, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

All Star Van & Storage v. Admiral Storage & Van, Inc.
658 S.W.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Poynor v. Bowie Independent School District
627 S.W.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Rhodes v. City of Austin
584 S.W.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Doyle v. Grady
543 S.W.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 S.W.2d 798, 17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 214, 1974 Tex. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harry-cloud-transport-inc-tex-1974.