State v. Harrison

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harrison

334 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 380, 2011 WL 1004860

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 2011·No. ED 94838·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Harrison appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of involuntary manslaughter, arguing the court erred in denying his request for a mistrial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial was not an abuse of discretion. State v. McGowan, 184 S.W.3d 607, 610 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Harrison appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of involuntary manslaughter, arguing the court erred in denying his request for a mistrial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial was not an abuse of discretion. State v. McGowan, 184 S.W.3d 607, 610 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Harrison, 334 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 380, 2011 WL 1004860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

334 S.W.3d 924 (State v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related