Schibbelhut v. Specialized Motor Systems, Inc.

334 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2011 WL 1004874
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 2011·No. ED 94867·Published

Opinion

*925 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer, Specialized Motor Systems, Inc., appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding claimant, Daniel Schibbelhut, eligible for unemployment benefits.

The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schibbelhut v. Specialized Motor Systems, Inc., 334 S.W.3d 924, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2011 WL 1004874 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

334 S.W.3d 924 (Schibbelhut v. Specialized Motor Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Harrison
334 S.W.3d 924 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)