State v. Harrison

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harrison

308 S.W.3d 274, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 445, 2010 WL 1460316

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harrison. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 380 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 2010·No. ED 92795·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin T. Harrison appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Harrison’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin T. Harrison appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Harrison’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Harrison, 308 S.W.3d 274, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 445, 2010 WL 1460316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

308 S.W.3d 274 (State v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.