State v. Harris

273 P.3d 277, 248 Or. App. 321, 2012 WL 762130, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 154
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 23, 2012·No. 091153540; A145171·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of attempting to assault a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, and interfering with a peace officer, ORS 162.247. He contends that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury that passive resistance does not constitute interference with a peace officer under ORS 162.247.1 The state concedes that the trial court erred in “declining defendant’s requested jury instruction, and the error was not harmless.” We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse and remand defendant’s conviction for interfering with a peace officer under ORS 162.247.

Conviction for interfering with a peace officer reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 273 P.3d 277, 248 Or. App. 321, 2012 WL 762130, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 154 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

273 P.3d 277 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Harris
273 P.3d 277 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)