State v. Harris

943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1423
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 2011·No. 2011-0008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 95128, 2010-Ohio-5374. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 6, 2010:

“Does the failure to include a mandatory driver’s license suspension in a criminal sentence render that sentence void?”
O’Donnell, J., would hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1605, State ex rel. Davis v. Ewers. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is State v. Thomas, Hamilton App. Nos. C-090716 and C-090463, 2010-Ohio-4856.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2011-0010, State v. Harris, Cuyahoga App. No. 95128, 2010-Ohio-5374.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 943 N.E.2d 571, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1423 (Ohio 2011).

943 N.E.2d 571 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Benjamin
2011 Ohio 5699 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)