State v. Harris

885 N.E.2d 957, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1501
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2008·No. 2007-2282·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-060989. Reported at 117 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2008-Ohio-969, 882 N.E.2d 446. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0394, State v. Hairston, Franklin App. No. 06AP-420, 2007-Ohio-143.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 885 N.E.2d 957, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1501 (Ohio 2008).

885 N.E.2d 957 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hairston, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2007)
2007 Ohio 143 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
O'Brien v. O'Brien
2008 Ohio 969 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)