State v. Harris
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Harris, 124 Ohio St.3d 472, 2010-Ohio-722.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HARRIS, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Harris, 124 Ohio St.3d 472, 2010-Ohio-722.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton. (No. 2008-0057 — Submitted January 13, 2010 — Decided March 4, 2010.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 89128, 2007-Ohio-6850. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of LANZINGER, J., in State v. Singleton. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew E. Meyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Paul A. Kuzmins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 Ohio 722 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.