State v. Harris

2010 Ohio 723, 923 N.E.2d 611, 124 Ohio St. 3d 474
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2010·No. 2008-1246·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 2010 Ohio 723, 923 N.E.2d 611, 124 Ohio St. 3d 474 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 723 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Singleton
2009 Ohio 6434 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)