State v. . Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Harris

137 S.E. 705, 193 N.C. 847, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 494

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. . Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 N.C. 306 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 27, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants made exceptions and assignments of

error, but filed no brief. From an examination’ of the entire record, we can discover no error. Before the argument, defendants filed a written motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. In criminal cases this Court never entertains a motion of this kind. S. v. Griffin, 190 N. C., p. 133, and cases cited.

There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendants made exceptions and assignments of

error, but filed no brief. From an examination’ of the entire record, we can discover no error. Before the argument, defendants filed a written motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. In criminal cases this Court never entertains a motion of this kind. S. v. Griffin, 190 N. C., p. 133, and cases cited.

There is

No error.

State v. . Harris, 137 S.E. 705, 193 N.C. 847, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 494 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

137 S.E. 705 (State v. . Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.