State v. . Harris

141 S.E. 883, 195 N.C. 306, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 74
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 14, 1928·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The bill of indictment charges the defendant and another with the larceny of “700 pounds of leaf tobacco, of the value of over $20, of goods, chattels and moneys of one Berry Haywood, Lucinda Speight and Mrs. Minnie Herring.” All the evidence adduced on the hearing tends to show that the tobacco, if stolen, was the property of Berry Speight. There is a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof; the charge relates to one offense, the proof to another. S. v. Harbert, 185 N. C., 760, 118 S. E., 6; S. v. Gibson, 170 N. C., 697, 86 S. E., 774.

The verdict will be set aside, the action dismissed as to the appealing' defendant, and the solicitor allowed to send another bill, if so advised.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Harris, 141 S.E. 883, 195 N.C. 306, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 74 (N.C. 1928).

141 S.E. 883 (State v. . Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hall
286 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Rogers
159 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Cooke
98 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. Hicks
62 S.E.2d 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State v. . Law
40 S.E.2d 699 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. . Weinstein
31 S.E.2d 920 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
State v. . Jackson
11 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Whitley
182 S.E. 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Franklin
167 S.E. 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
State v. . Grace
145 S.E. 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)